Τρίτη 28 Ιανουαρίου 2020

Prevalence and incidence of thyroid dysfunction in type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II.

Prevalence and incidence of thyroid dysfunction in type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II.:

Related Articles
Prevalence and incidence of thyroid dysfunction in type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II.

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2020 Jan 27;:

Authors: Peters KE, Chubb SAP, Bruce DG, Davis WA, Davis TME

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since the results of published studies assessing thyroid dysfunction complicating diabetes have been variable in quality, inconsistent and may not reflect contemporary clinical care, the aim of this study was to determine its prevalence and incidence in a large, well characterised, representative cohort.

DESIGN: Community-based, longitudinal, observational study.

PATIENTS: 1,617 participants from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II (FDS2), including 130 (8.0%) with type 1 diabetes, 1,408 (87.1%) with type 2 diabetes, and 79 (4.9%) with latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA).

MEASUREMENTS: Serum thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) at baseline between 2008 and 2011 and in those attending Year 4 follow-up.

RESULTS: The prevalence of known thyroid disease (ascertained from baseline self-reported thyroid medication use or hospitalisation data) was 11.7% (189/1,617). Of the remaining 1,428 participants, 5.1% (73/1,428) had biochemical evidence of subclinical hypothyroidism, 1.1% (15/1,428) overt hypothyroidism, 0.1% (2/1,428) subclinical hyperthyroidism, and 0.2% (3/1,428) overt hyperthyroidism, representing an overall baseline prevalence of thyroid disease of 17.4% (282/1,617). During 5,694 patient-years of follow-up, 25 (3.0%) of the 844 with a normal baseline TSH and follow-up data developed known thyroid disease. Of the remaining 819, 3.4% developed subclinical hypothyroidism, 0.2% overt hypothyroidism, and 0.5% subclinical hyperthyroidism. There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence or incidence of thyroid dysfunction by diabetes type.

CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid dysfunction, known or detected through screening, is common in diabetes. These data suggest the need for periodic clinical and biochemical screening for thyroid disease in all types of diabetes.

PMID: 31984536 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου