Impact of an Outpatient Cardiology-managed Urgent Access and Observation Unit on Hospital Admissions Introduction: Alternatives to the emergency department (ED) for expedient and high-value team-based cardiology care for patients with chest pain, volume overload, palpitations, and other urgent, but not life-threatening cardiac conditions are lacking. Here, we report on the development of the Cardiac Direct Access Unit (CDAc), an ambulatory cardiology unit with exam rooms, observation bays, and an advanced heart failure clinic. Methods: Patients referred to the CDAc are seen same-day by an attending cardiologist in a space independent from the ED. We performed a retrospective review of 1146 consecutive patients referred to the CDAc in its first year of operation. Among patients who were referred for urgent same-day evaluation, 60.1% were discharged home without observation. Results: Among the patients observed or directly discharged from CDAc, 2.4% were readmitted within 30 days for a related symptom. The highest rate of readmission (7.5%) was for heart failure, which compares favorably with guidelines for readmission benchmarks. Conclusion: Our first year of data suggests that a cardiology-directed observation unit may serve as a high-value alternative to the ED for appropriately selected patients.

Possible Missed Acute Coronary Syndrome Rate in North Texas: Is There Room to Improve? Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Missing this diagnosis may lead to increased morbidity or mortality. With improved cardiac biomarkers tests, it is unknown if that has decreased the prevalence of ACS diagnoses in ED patients who were recently evaluated in the ED. Methods: This is a retrospective review of ED patients who were diagnosed with ACS and seen in the ED 7 and 30 days before that visit in North Texas between 2009 and 2015. The demographics and temporal trends of missed ACS rates are described. Logistic regression was used to evaluate if any factors (ie, age, ethnicity, sex, insurance status) were significant. Results: Between December 26, 2008 and June 29, 2015, there were 24,914 diagnoses of ACS in the ED. The overall prevalence of patients diagnosed with ACS 7 days after their ED visit was 3.2% and 8.8% at 30 days. For patients diagnosed with ACS 7 days and 30 days after an ED visit, the most common initial ED diagnoses were nonspecific chest pain (57.7%), atherosclerotic disease (19.5%), and heart failure (12.8%). Between 2009 and 2015, there was no overall change in the rate of ACS diagnoses in patients seen 7 or 30 days before an ED visit. Conclusions: The prevalence of missed ACS in the North Texas region at 7 and 30 days after the initial ED visit is low and has not changed over the past several years.

Comparing the Modified History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin Score and Coronary Artery Disease Consortium Model for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Chest Pain The objective of this study was to compare the History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) score and clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) consortium (CADC) model for predicting obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis on coronary computed tomographic angiography) and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, composite of acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, and mortality). We studied 1981 patients with no known CAD who presented with acute chest pain and had negative initial troponin and electrocardiogram. Chest pain was classified as typical, atypical, and nonanginal and used to score the history component of the modified HEART score. The C-statistic for predicting obstructive CAD was 0.747 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.712–0.783] for the HEART score and 0.792 (95% CI, 0.762–0.823) for the CADC model (P = 0.0005). The C-statistic for predicting 30-day MACE was 0.820 (95% CI, 0.774–0.864) for the HEART score and 0.850 (95% CI, 0.800–0.891) for the CADC model (P = 0.11). Among the 48.3% of patients for whom the CADC model predicted ≤5% probability of obstructive CAD, the observed 30-day MACE was 0.6%; among the 48.9% of patients for whom the HEART score was ≤2, the 30-day MACE was 0.6%. In conclusion, the CADC model was more effective at predicting obstructive CAD compared to the HEART score. The HEART score and CADC model were equally effective to safely identify low-risk patients by achieving <1% missed 30-day MACE.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes: Bivalirudin With Transfemoral Access Versus Heparin With Transradial Access in Patients With ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Introduction: The best combination of access site and anticoagulant used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction is not known. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients >18 years of age who underwent primary PCI in 2 large regional ST segment elevation myocardial infarction centers in Massachusetts between 2012 and 2014. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: bival/fem, hep/rad, or off-protocol, based on anticoagulation and access used. We used multiple logistic regression model to compare major cardiovascular events—major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding complications between the 2 on-protocol groups (bival/fem and hep/rad). Results: Of the 1074 patients in this study, there were 443 (41%), 501 (47%), and 130 (12%) patients in bival/fem, hep/rad, and off-protocol groups, respectively. There were significantly higher number of cardiogenic shock patients in the bival/fem compared to the hep/rad group (6.5% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001). There was a trend toward reduced MACE in the hep/rad group compared to bival/fem (2.8 % vs. 5.1%, P = 0.068). When cardiogenic shock patients are excluded, there is no significant difference in mortality rates (bival/fem: 2.7% vs. hep/rad: 1.0%, P = 0.07) or bleeding complications between the groups (hep/rad: 4.5% vs. bival/fem: 2.1%, P = 0.06). Conclusions: In patients undergoing primary PCI, there was a trend toward reduced inpatient MACE with the use of heparin and radial access compared with bivalirudin with femoral access. In patients without cardiogenic shock, there is no significant difference in mortality or bleeding rates between the 2 groups.

The Association Between Modified Intracoronary Thrombus Grade and Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Initial Laboratory Findings in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The thrombus burden has been shown to affect the immediate results of primary coronary intervention and the outcome of the patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the cardiovascular risk factors and initial laboratory findings associated with angiographic thrombotic grade based on the new reclassified grading method. A total of 394 consecutive patients presenting with a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary intervention were retrospectively evaluated between March 2014 and March 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups of low thrombus grade (grades 1–3) and high thrombus grade (grade 4). The results showed that the patients with high thrombus grade had markedly higher white blood cell (WBC) counts, platelet counts, and initial troponin levels (P values were <0.001, 0.004, and <0.001, respectively). After logistic regression analysis, high WBC count had the strongest association with high thrombus grade [odds ratio: 3.185, 95% confidence interval: 1.349–7.520; P = 0.008]. The initial troponin level also had significant association with high thrombus grade, whereas high platelet count had a borderline statistical significance (odds ratio: 2.250, 95% confidence interval: 0.928–5.459; P = 0.073). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that high WBC and higher levels of baseline troponin were associated with high angiographic thrombus grade in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Gut Microbiota, Atherosclerosis, and Therapeutic Targets Several studies have gathered interest in the relationship between gut microbiota and atherosclerosis. Gut microbiota and its metabolites, such as trimethylamine-N-oxide, and gut dysbiosis play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis. Also, inflammation, derived by the intestinal tract, adds another mechanism through which the ecosystem of the human body affects the metabolic diseases and, furthermore, cardiovascular diseases. The scientific world should fixate the understanding of the exact physiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms for atherogenesis by gut microbiota and through that, new ways for novel therapeutic targets will be available in the coming years. This review summarizes the latest data on this matter.

Management of Severe Bleeding in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants: Proceedings Monograph From the Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group-International Multidisciplinary Severe Bleeding Consensus Panel October 20, 2018 In this Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group (EMCREG)-International Proceedings Monograph from the October 20, 2018, EMCREG-International Multidisciplinary Consensus Panel on Management of Severe Bleeding in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants held in Orlando, FL, you will find a detailed discussion regarding the treatment of patients requiring anticoagulation and the reversal of anticoagulation for patients with severe bleeding. For emergency physicians, critical care physicians, hospitalists, cardiologists, internists, surgeons, and family physicians, the current approach and disease indications for treatment with anticoagulants such as coumadin, factor IIa, and factor Xa inhibitors are particularly relevant. When a patient treated with anticoagulants presents to the emergency department, intensive care unit, or operating room with severe, uncontrollable bleeding, achieving rapid, controlled hemostasis is critically important to save the patient’s life. This EMCREG-International Proceedings Monograph contains multiple sections reflecting critical input from experts in Emergency Cardiovascular Care, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medicine Operations, Hematology, Hospital Medicine, Neurocritical Care, Cardiovascular Critical Care, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiology, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, and Pharmacy. The first section provides a description of the current indications for the treatment of patients using oral anticoagulants including coumadin, the factor IIa (thrombin) inhibitor dabigatran, and factor Xa inhibitors such as apixaban and rivaroxaban. In the remaining sections, the treatment of patients presenting to the hospital with major bleeding becomes the focus. The replacement of blood components including red blood cells, platelets, and clotting factors is the critically important initial treatment for these individuals. Reversing the anticoagulated state is also necessary. For patients treated with coumadin, infusion of vitamin K helps to initiate the process of protein synthesis for the vitamin K–dependent coagulation proteins II, VII, IX, and X and the antithrombotic protein C and protein S. Repletion of clotting factors for the patient with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, which includes factors II (prothrombin), VII, IX, and X and therapeutically effective concentrations of the regulatory proteins (protein C and S), provides real-time ability to slow bleeding. For patients treated with the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, treatment using the highly specific, antibody-derived idarucizumab has been demonstrated to reverse the hypocoagulable state of the patient to allow blood clotting. In May 2018, andexanet alfa was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reverse the factor Xa anticoagulants apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with major bleeding. Before the availability of this highly specific agent, therapy for patients treated with factor Xa inhibitors presenting with severe bleeding usually included replacement of lost blood components including red blood cells, platelets, and clotting factors and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, or if not available, fresh frozen plasma. The evaluation and treatment of the patient with severe bleeding as a complication of oral anticoagulant therapy are discussed from the viewpoint of the emergency physician, neurocritical and cardiovascular critical care intensivist, hematologist, trauma and acute care surgeon, hospitalist, cardiologist, electrophysiologist, and pharmacist in an approach we hope that the reader will find extremely practical and clinically useful. The clinician learner will also find the discussion of the resumption of oral anticoagulation for the patient with severe bleeding after effective treatment important because returning the patient to an anticoagulated state as soon as feasible and safe prevents thrombotic complications. Finally, an EMCREG-International Severe Bleeding Consensus Panel algorithm for the approach to management of patients with life-threatening oral anticoagulant–associated bleeding is provided for the clinician and can be expanded in size for use in a treatment area such as the emergency department or critical care unit.