Interferences between Clot in the Erythrocyte Sediment and Hemostasis Exploration.

Interferences between Clot in the Erythrocyte Sediment and Hemostasis Exploration.:

Interferences between Clot in the Erythrocyte Sediment and Hemostasis Exploration.

Clin Lab. 2020 Sep 01;66(9):

Authors: Delianu C, Moscalu M, Ghizdovat V, Hurjui LL, Hurjui I, Tărniceriu CC, Foia L

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selection and rejection of non-conforming coagulation specimens is essential in safeguarding quality management in hemostasis laboratories that provide routine testing for bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In order to increase quality, it is important to reduce pre-analytical errors that generally account for 60 - 70% of total laboratory failure. The accidental presence of clots in vitro, in the pre-analytical phase of the coagulation, is a reason for coagulation specimen rejection, given that the reliability of test results can be adversely compromised. This study aimed to ascertain the effect of clots identified in the post-analytical phase within the blood sample sediments upon standard laboratory tests such as PT (prothrombin time) and APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time).

METHODS: From a total of 24,670 coagulation specimens gathered and prospectively collected and analyzed at the Haematology Laboratory of the ˮSf. Spiridonˮ Emergency County Hospital Iasi, Romania, during four months, 671 were identified with clot. Of the coagulated samples, 153 (22.80%) were considered for this study, including those specimens pinpointed with sediment clot through a post-analytical new reverification procedure.

RESULTS: The comparative study of the PT and APTT results obtained based on the samples identified with sediment clots in relation to the actual results recorded after the repetition of the sampling, pointed out 43.93% false results for PT1 test, with a significant difference between the variances of the values at the two evaluated moments (t = 2.961, p = 0.0037). The pattern was congruent in the case of the APTT test as well, exhibiting 69.04% false results, for which the variances of values at the two evaluated moments displayed significant differences (t = 2.208, p = 0.0306). In both of the cases significantly lower mean values were noted in the second determination of PT (PT1: 33.1 ± 39.6 vs. PT2: 25.8 ± 30.5) and APTT (APTT1: 42.8 ± 42.7 vs. APTT2: 38.1 ± 26.1. Results are important as they highlight the actual interference between the clot in the erythrocyte sediment and the evaluation of the patient's hemostasis.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the presence of clots in the erythrocyte sediment, with no identification prior to centrifugation, significantly affect the PT and APTT analysis, their accurate results being critical for the proper diagnosis and monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.



PMID: 32902218 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]