Ex Vivo Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Conventional Chemomechanical Debridement Alone and in Combination with Light-Activated Disinfection and Laser Irradiation Against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm

Ex Vivo Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Conventional Chemomechanical Debridement Alone and in Combination with Light-Activated Disinfection and Laser Irradiation Against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm:



Publication date: Available online 2 January 2020

Source: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy

Author(s): Abdollah Ghorbanzadeh, Abbas Bahador, Pegah Sarraf, Roya Ayar, Reza Fekrazad, Sohrab Asefi

Abstract

Background and objectives

Intracanal disinfection plays an important role in endodontic treatment success. Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a resistant microorganism responsible for endodontic infections. We aimed to assess the bactericidal effects of three disinfection methods on E. faecalis biofilm.

Materials and methods

Fifty-five freshly extracted single-rooted human teeth were evaluated. A barbed broach was used to extract the pulp tissue. No further root canal preparation was performed. Specimens were sterilized with gamma radiation, and inoculated with E. faecalis suspension. They were then incubated for 4 days and 4 weeks. Biofilm formation was confirmed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The teeth were randomly assigned to three subgroups (n = 7) to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the following three disinfection methods against immature (4-day) and mature (4-week) biofilms: the conventional chemomechanical debridement (CCMD), CCMD + light-activated disinfection (LAD; 810 nm, 0.3 W, 120 J/cm²) with indocyanine Green (EmunDo) as photosensitizer and CCMD + diode laser irradiation (810 nm, 2 W). The teeth were then longitudinally split into two halves and the colony count was reported as colony forming units (CFUs) to assess bacterial viability after each disinfection protocol.

Results

None of the disinfection methods could completely remove the biofilm. CCMD + LAD caused the highest and CCMD + diode laser caused the lowest reduction in biofilm. Antibacterial efficacy was significantly lower against the mature (4-week) biofilm compared with immature (4-day) biofilm in all groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

All three disinfection methods were effective for partial elimination of E. faecalis biofilm. But CCMD + LAD was significantly more efficacious in decreasing both mature and immature biofilms.