Patient Safety Culture, Health Information Technology Implementation, and Medical Office Problems That Could Lead to Diagnostic Error Background Diagnostic errors may cause harm to patients by preventing or delaying appropriate treatment or by leading to unnecessary or harmful treatment. Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between patient safety culture, health information technology (IT) implementation, and the frequency of problems that could lead to diagnostic errors in the medical office setting, such as unavailable test results, unavailable medical records, or unpursued abnormal results. Methods We used survey data from 925 medical offices nationwide that voluntarily submitted results to the 2012 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Medical Office Surveys on Patient Safety Culture database. At the office level, we ran a multivariate regression model to estimate the effect of culture on problem frequency while controlling for office-reported implementation levels of health IT, office characteristics such as the number of locations, and survey characteristics such as the percent of respondents that were physicians. Results The most frequent problem was “results from a lab or imaging test were not available when needed”; across 925 offices, the average was 15% reporting that it happened daily or weekly. Higher overall culture scores were significantly associated with fewer occurrences of each problem assessed. Compared with offices with completed health IT implementation, offices in the process of health IT implementation had higher frequency of problems. Conclusions This study offers insight into how patient safety culture and health IT implementation in medical offices can influence the frequency of breakdowns in processes of care, thereby identifying potential vulnerabilities that can increase diagnostic errors.

Living Donor Nephrectomy: Is It as Safe as It Can Be? Analysis of Living Donor Deaths in the United States Introduction The reported 90-day rate of death from living donor nephrectomy is 3 in 10,000 donations. Although this risk is low, the important question is how many deaths are preventable? Methods To study this question, all living donor nephrectomy cases, 139,186 procedures, recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database since its inception in 1987 were analyzed to determine the death rate and the number of deaths that were potentially preventable. Preventable deaths were defined as any death in the first 7 days except due to clearly unrelated events or death from hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, infection, cardiovascular cause, or suicide in the first 90 days. Results The numbers of deaths at 7, 30, 90, and 365 days after donation were 16, 26, 38, and 86, which translated into 1.15, 1.87, 2.73, and 6.18 deaths per 10,000 donations, respectively. From 2000 onward, when coding was available for cause of death, 19 of the 30 deaths were deemed potentially preventable. The nonrisk-adjusted rate of death with laparoscopic donation was higher than open nephrectomy, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conversion from laparoscopic to open nephrectomy occurs in approximately 1 in 100 surgeries, and this rate has remained fairly steady since 2005. Conclusions This analysis suggests that up to two thirds of deaths are potentially preventable. The transplant community should consider additional safety strategies such as simulation training of rare complications to lower donor risk.

Electronic Health Record–Related Events in Medical Malpractice Claims: User Error Versus Use Error No abstract available

Re: Cell Phone Calls in the Operating Theater and Staff Distractions: . No abstract available

Rock, Paper, Scissors No abstract available

Investing in Physicians Is Investing in Patients: Enhancing Patient Safety Through Physician Health and Well-Being Research Keeping medical practitioners healthy is an important consideration for workforce satisfaction and retention, as well as public safety. However, there is limited evidence demonstrating how to best care for this group. The absence of data is related to the lack of available funding in this area of research. Supporting investigations that examine physician health often “fall through the cracks” of traditional funding opportunities, landing somewhere between patient safety and workforce development priorities. To address this, funders must extend the scope of current grant opportunities by broadening the scope of patient safety and its relationship to physician health. Other considerations are allocating a portion of doctors' licensing fees to support physician health research and encourage researchers to collaborate with interested stakeholders who can underwrite the costs of studies. Ultimately, funding studies of physician health benefits not only the community of doctors but also the millions of patients receiving care each year.

Changing the Patient Safety Paradigm No abstract available

Behavior of Anesthesiology Residents in a Situation of Intravenous Route Occlusion During Syringe Pump Use in a Simulated Intensive Care Unit Introduction Unintentional catecholamine flush caused by inappropriate release of an intravenous occlusion during use of a syringe pump in the intensive care unit (ICU) can have dangerous consequences in patients receiving critical care. We investigated whether anesthesiology residents understood how to deal with syringe pump occlusion in a simulated ICU setting. Methods We set up a mannequin that virtually simulated a sedated patient under mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery, with epinephrine and dopamine being infused by syringe pumps to maintain blood pressure at 100/50 mm Hg. Prior to a participant entering the simulated ICU, one of the stopcocks for the catecholamine was occluded. Thereafter, the blood pressure of the mannequin dropped to 60/30 mm Hg. If the participant inappropriately released the occlusion, resulting in a catecholamine flush, an operator immediately elevated the blood pressure to 200/100 mm Hg. In the subsequent debriefing session, the simulation facilitator evaluated whether the participant could diagnose that intravenous occlusion was the cause of hypotension in this scenario. Results Sixteen anesthesiology residents participated in the study. Only 3 of 10 participants who had previous knowledge of how such situations should be handled could appropriately release back pressure. Eleven residents released the occlusion without relieving syringe pressure. After their debriefing sessions, all the participants were of the opinion that the present simulation training was impressive and useful for them. Conclusions Anesthesiology residents might inappropriately handle a situation of intravenous occlusion in their clinical practice. It may be necessary for the manufacturers to improve the safety features of syringe pumps.

Use of Designated Nurse PICC Teams and CLABSI Prevention Practices Among U.S. Hospitals: A Survey-Based Study Objectives The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has increased substantially within hospitals during the past several years. Yet, the prevalence and practices of designated nurse PICC teams (i.e., specially trained nurses who are responsible for PICC insertions at a hospital) are unknown. We, therefore, identified the prevalence of and factors associated with having a designated nurse PICC team among U.S. acute care hospitals. Methods We conducted a survey of infection preventionists at a random sample of U.S. hospitals in May 2013, which asked about personnel who insert PICCs and the use of practices to prevent device-associated infections, including central line–associated bloodstream infection. We compared practice use between hospitals that have a designated nurse PICC team versus those that do not. Results Survey response rate was 70% (403/575). According to the respondents, nurse PICC teams inserted PICCs in more than 60% of U.S. hospitals in 2013. Moreover, certain practices to prevent central line–associated bloodstream infection, including maximum sterile barrier precautions (93% versus 88%, P = 0.06), chlorhexidine gluconate for insertion site antisepsis (96% versus 87%, P = .003) and facility-wide insertion checklists (95% versus 87%, P = 0.02) were regularly used by a higher percentage of hospitals with nurse PICC teams compared with those without. Conclusions These data suggest that nurse PICC teams play an integral role in PICC use at many hospitals and that use of such teams may promote key practices to prevent complications. Better understanding of the role, composition, and practice of such teams is an important area for future study.

Does Physician's Training Induce Overconfidence That Hampers Disclosing Errors? Purpose Although transparency is critical for reducing medical errors, physicians feel discomfort with disclosure. We explored whether overconfidence relates to physician's reluctance to admit that an error may have occurred. Method At 3 university medical centers, a survey presented a clinical vignette of a girl with urinary infection and penicillin allergy to medical students and physicians, asking them to rate their level of confidence for each step of the diagnosis and management. After anaphylaxis develops after cephalosporin administration, respondents were asked about their willingness to admit that an error might have occurred and to rate their level of discomfort in doing so. We analyzed levels of confidence, accuracy, willingness to admit mistake, and discomfort. Results Respondents reported high levels of confidence for their answers to the questions of diagnosis and management, even when wrong—indicating miscalibration of confidence and accuracy. Compared with students, physicians had significantly higher levels of confidence, lower accuracy, and lower willingness to admit mistake. Although most respondents agreed in principle that errors should be disclosed, in the presented case, significantly less agreed to admit that a mistake might have occurred or to say so explicitly to the family. An association was found between overconfidence and discomfort with disclosure. Conclusions Our study shows overconfidence associated with clinician's training and with reluctance to admit mistake, suggesting a contributing role to the difficulty in leveraging safety events into quality improvement. Training physicians to have both knowledge and adequate self-doubt is an educational challenge.