Lokal konsolidierende Strahlentherapie beim oligometastasierten Nicht-kleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom

Extreme Hypofraktionierung beim lokalisierten Prostatakarzinom. 5-Jahresergebnisse der HYPO-RT-PC-Studie: Kommentar I

Extreme Hypofraktionierung beim lokalisierten Prostatakarzinom. 5-Jahresergebnisse der HYPO-RT-PC-Studie: Kommentar II

Dosis-Deeskalation der adjuvanten Radiochemotherapie bei HPV-positiven Oropharynxkarzinomen: die MC1273-Phase-II-Studie

Addition of chemotherapy to hyperfractionated radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer—a meta-analysis Abstract Background Adding concurrent chemotherapy (CTx) to definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) improves overall survival. A comparable effect has been reported for hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFX-RT) alone. Adding concurrent CTx to HFX-RT has been investigated in multiple trials, yet an evident effect on oncological outcomes and toxicity profile has not been established to date. Thus, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis on the clinical outcome and toxicity of the addition of CTx to HFX-RT. Patients and methods We performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials comparing HFX-RT alone to HFX-RT + concurrent CTx in patients with LA-HNSCC undergoing definite RT. A meta-analysis was performed using the event rates and effect-sizes for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant metastasis-free survival and distant recurrence-free interval (DMFS/DMFI) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) as investigated endpoints. Furthermore, we compared selected acute and late toxicities in the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmont, WA, USA) add-in MetaXL 5.3 (EpiGear International, Sunrise Beach, Australia), utilizing the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Results We identified six studies (n = 1280 patients) randomizing HFX-RT alone and the concurrent addition of CTx. OS was significantly improved in the HFX-RT + CTx group (HR = 0.77, CI95% = 0.66–0.89; p = <0.001). We found similar results in PFS (HR = 0.74, CI95% = 0.63–0.87; p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.72, CI95% = 0.60–0.88; p = 0.001). In contrast, acute toxicities (≥grade 3 mucositis, ≥grade 3 dysphagia) and late adverse events including ≥grade 3 xerostomia, ≥grade 3 subcutaneous, ≥grade 3 bone, ≥grade 3 skin toxicity, and ≥grade 3 dysphagia did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion The addition of CTx to HFX-RT in the definitive treatment of advanced LA-HNSCC improves OS, CSS, PFS, and LRR without a significant increase in high-grade acute and late toxicities.

Radiotherapy of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline—is the risk of relevant errors overestimated? Abstract Purpose Ionizing radiation is able to cause severe damage to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In Germany, the DEGRO/DGK guideline recommends close monitoring of patients with CIEDs undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Nevertheless, especially in the era of intensity-modulated techniques and predominant use of 6 MV photons, errors of CIEDs are rare events. Therefore, we performed daily CIED controls and hypothesized that no relevant device interaction would occur in our cohort. Methods From 2014 to 2018, we collected data of 51 patients (62 courses) with daily interrogation (n = 1046) of CIED. The dose to the skin above the CIED was measured by semiconductor or ion chamber dosimetry at least once per RT course. In many cases the dose was also calculated. Results The prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 7.5 to 78.0 Gy (IQR 27.8–61.0 Gy). The median measured cumulative dose to the skin above the CIED was 0.17 Gy, whereas the median calculated dose was 1.03 Gy. No error occurred in the group with maximum beam energy >10 MeV. Three events without clinical relevance could be recognized in the group with an intensity-modulated technique at 6 MV. None of the three concerned devices were located directly within the PTV. Conclusion Errors of CIEDs during RT are rare events. The approach according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline is safe, but also consumes resources. In our cohort it was not compulsory to relocate any CIED. Clinically relevant events are uncommon, so it remains debatable which procedure is necessary. Daily controls could be avoided in some selected cases without compromising patient safety.

Radiotherapy for painful benign skeletal disorders Abstract Purpose The aim of this retrospective clinical quality assessment was to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose radiotherapy (RT) for painful benign skeletal disorders. Methods Patients with different painful benign skeletal disorders (arthrosis and enthesopathies) were recruited for this retrospective clinical quality assessment between January 2014 and December 2015. RT was applied with a linear accelerator. Single doses of 0.5 Gy (total dose 3.0–5.0 Gy) were used. Pain was measured before and immediately after RT (early response) by a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). We defined a VAS score of 0–2 as a good response. Pain relief was measured during follow-up. Results A total of 598 evaluable patients (394 females, 204 males) with a mean age of 61.4 years (range 33–81 years) were recruited. The median VAS score was 7.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) before treatment and 5.0 (IQR 4) upon completion of RT (p < 0.001). A good response was achieved upon completion of RT in 83 patients (13.9%), with a median follow-up of 38 months (range 29–47 months) in 373 patients (62.4%; p < 0.001). In general, RT had a better effect on enthesopathies than on arthrosis. Conclusion Low-dose RT is a very effective treatment for the management of painful benign skeletal disorders. Due to the delayed onset of analgesic effects, low-dose RT results in significantly improved long-term efficacy compared to the results immediately after RT. These findings confirm the results of other retrospective, prospective, and randomized trials.

Re-irradiation for osteoarthritis—retrospective analysis of 217 joints Abstract Purpose Osteoarthritis is a common disease with a prevalence of approximately 8.9% among the average population. One treatment option is low-dose radiotherapy. Some authors mention that they apply a second or third course of radiation for recurrent pain or partial or no response to the initial course. As the results of re-irradiation have not been analysed systematically, the aim of this study was to document the results of repeated radiation treatment and to identify those patients who will benefit. Methods and materials The analysis was performed on patients of three German radiotherapy institutions and included 217 re-irradiated joints. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Evaluation of the NRS was done before and directly after each radiation therapy as well as at the follow-up of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 67 years, with 40% male and 60% female patients. Re-irradiation was indicated because the initial radiotherapy resulted in no response in 21.2%, in partial response in 41.5%, and in recurrent pain in 37.3%. Results We found a significant response to re-irradiation. For the whole sample, the median pain was 6 before re-irradiation, 4 after 6 weeks, and 3 after 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. The percentage of patients being free of pain or with very little pain was approximately 25% 12 months after re-irradiation. All subgroups, notably those with no response to the first course versus partial response to the first course versus recurrent pain, had significant reduction of pain. Conclusion Re-irradiation of osteoarthritis is an effective and safe treatment. All subgroups showed a good response to re-irradiation for at least 24 months.

Automatic image segmentation based on synthetic tissue model for delineating organs at risk in spinal metastasis treatment planning Abstract Purpose One of the main goals in software solutions for treatment planning is to automatize delineation of organs at risk (OARs). In this pilot feasibility study a clinical validation was made of computed tomography (CT)-based extracranial auto-segmentation (AS) using the Brainlab Anatomical Mapping tool (AM). Methods The delineation of nine extracranial OARs (lungs, kidneys, trachea, heart, liver, spinal cord, esophagus) from clinical datasets of 24 treated patients was retrospectively evaluated. Manual delineation of OARs was conducted in clinical routine and compared with AS datasets using AM. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) were used as statistical and geometrical measurements, respectively. Additionally, all AS structures were validated using a subjective qualitative scoring system. Results All patient datasets investigated were successfully processed with the evaluated AS software. For the left lung (0.97 ± 0.03), right lung (0.97 ± 0.05), left kidney (0.91 ± 0.07), and trachea (0.93 ± 0.04), the DSC was high with low variability. The DSC scores of other organs (right kidney, heart, liver, spinal cord), except the esophagus, ranged between 0.7 and 0.9. The calculated HD values yielded comparable results. Qualitative assessment showed a general acceptance in more than 85% of AS OARs—except for the esophagus. Conclusions The Brainlab AM software is ready for clinical use in most of the OARs evaluated in the thoracic and abdominal region. The software generates highly conformal structure sets compared to manual contouring. The current study design needs revision for further research.

Stability and survival analysis of elderly patients with osteolytic spinal bone metastases after palliative radiotherapy Abstract Purpose This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the stability and fracture rates of osteolytic spinal bone metastases (SBM) in elderly patients following palliative radiotherapy (RT) and to derive prognostic factors for stability and survival. Methods A total of 322 patients aged at least 70 years received palliative RT at two major German academic medical centers or at the German Cancer Research Center. Stability assessment was based on the validated Taneichi score prior to RT and at 3 and 6 months after RT. The survival time following RT was assessed, and prognostic factors for stability and survival were analyzed. Results Prior to RT, 183 patients (57%) exhibited unstable SBM and 68 patients (21%) pathological fractures. At 3 and 6 months after RT, significant recalcification and stabilization were evident in 19% (23/118) and 40% (31/78) of surviving patients, respectively. Only 17 patients (5%) experienced new pathological fractures following RT. Tumor histology was found to significantly influence stabilization rates with only breast cancer patients exhibiting increased stabilization compared to patients with other histologies. The median survival time and 6‑month survival rates following RT were 5.4 months (95% confidence interval 4.4–7.2 months) and 48%, respectively. The patients’ performance status was found to be the strongest predictor for survival after RT in this patient cohort; further factors demonstrating a significant association with survival were the application of systemic treatment, the number of SBM and the primary tumor histology. To analyze the influence of age on survival after RT, study patients were stratified into 3 age groups (i.e., 70–74 years, 75–79 years, and ≥80 years). The subgroup of patients aged at least 80 years showed a strong trend towards a worse survival time following RT compared to younger patients (i.e., 6‑month survival rate 39% vs. 51%; p = 0.06, log-rank test). Conclusions Prognostic factors influencing overall survival such as performance status and histology should guide the choice for palliative RT for SBM. Strongly hypofractionated RT regimes may be advisable for most elderly patients considering the overall poor prognosis in order to reduce hospitalization times.